Ayaan Sadiq.
← Back to the case study

The operating layer behind a 30+ creator program

The creative is the visible half of a creator program. This is the other half: the tracker that holds thirty deliverables, the brief that stops the revision spiral, and the weekly report that decides who gets rebooked. These three documents are why the engagement number in the case study exists.

What you are looking at. The brief is my own template and is shown in full. The tracker and the weekly report are rebuilt with sample data: creator names, handles and client identifiers are removed at the client's request, and the figures shown are illustrative of the structure, not the client's actual results. The reported outcome, a 25 to 40% lift in engagement, comes from the client's own reporting and is not derived from the numbers on this page.

Artifact 01

Delivery tracker

One row per creator, one owner per column. Everything that can stall a campaign has a date and a status on this sheet: brief sent, draft in, revision, disclosure check, live. When thirty creators are live at once, this is the difference between a program and thirty separate conversations.

creator-delivery-trackerSample data · client fields removed
CreatorTierPlatformDeliverableBrief sentDraft dueRev.LiveDisclosureStatusViewsER
MidInstagram1 Reel + 3 StoriesMar 04Mar 091Mar 14#adLive41,2006.1%
NanoTikTok1 videoMar 04Mar 090Mar 12#adLive18,9408.4%
MidInstagram1 ReelMar 04Mar 092Mar 17#adLive, 3d late33,5104.9%
NanoTikTok2 videosMar 04Mar 101Mar 15#adLive22,7807.6%
NanoInstagram3 StoriesMar 04Mar 100Mar 13Paid partnershipLive9,1205.2%
MidTikTok1 videoMar 04Mar 101Mar 16#adLive57,3006.8%
NanoInstagram1 Reel + 2 StoriesMar 05Mar 110Mar 15#adLive14,6609.1%
NanoTikTok1 videoMar 05Mar 11n/an/an/aDropped, no draftn/an/a
MidInstagram1 ReelMar 05Mar 121Mar 18#adLive38,0205.7%
NanoInstagram3 StoriesMar 05Mar 120Mar 16Paid partnershipLive11,4806.3%

Rows 1 to 10 of 31. Remaining rows and the client tabs (rate card, contracts, usage rights) are removed.

The two columns people forget are Revisions and Disclosure. Revision count is the early warning that a brief was unclear. Disclosure is the one that becomes a legal problem rather than a marketing one.

Artifact 02

Creator brief template

One page. If a brief runs longer, the creator skims it and you pay for that in revisions. Everything here exists to answer a question a creator would otherwise ask over DM at 11pm.

creator-brief-templateMy own template · shown in full

Campaign brief

Creator name · tier · platform · deliverable count · fee

The one thing
One sentence. If the audience remembers nothing else from this post, this is it. Written by me, not by the creator.
Why you
The specific reason this creator was picked. Names the format or the audience overlap, not flattery. Creators produce better work when the brief proves you watched their content.
Audience
Who the brand is trying to reach, and how that differs from the creator's usual viewer.
Deliverables and specs
  • Format, count, aspect ratio, duration range
  • Where the hook has to land, in seconds
  • Caption length, link placement, on-screen text rules
  • Raw file handover: yes or no, and by when
Hook direction
Two or three angles, not a script. A script produces an ad. An angle produces something that sounds like the creator.
Must include
Product name spoken or on screen, offer or code, disclosure tag, brand handle.
Must avoid
Competitor mentions, claims the brand cannot substantiate, restricted music, anything the brand's legal team has flagged.
Disclosure
Non-negotiable. The exact tag and where it goes. Checked before the post goes live, not after.
Dates
Draft due, feedback returned within 48h, one revision round included, live window.
Approval loop
Who reviews, in what order, and what happens if feedback is late. Named person, not a department.
Usage rights
What the brand can reuse, on what surfaces, for how long, and whether paid amplification is included.
How this is measured
The metric the creator is actually being judged on, stated upfront. Sent to the creator with their own numbers after the campaign.

The last field is the one most briefs leave out. Telling a creator how they will be measured, before they film, is the cheapest performance lever in the program.

Artifact 03

Weekly report

One page, sent every Monday. Its job is not to display data, it is to force a decision: who gets rebooked, what gets cut, and what changes in next week's brief.

weekly-reportSample data · client fields removed
18
creators live this week
24
deliverables shipped
83%
shipped on the first due date
6.4%
avg engagement rate
Nano tier7.4%
Mid tier5.8%
Brand baseline4.4%
What moved
Nano tier outperformed mid tier on engagement rate for the third week running, at roughly a third of the fee. Two mid-tier creators drove most of the raw reach.
What stalled
Three drafts came in late against the same brief version. The brief was ambiguous on hook placement, which also explains the revision spike.
Changed this week
Hook direction rewritten to name the first three seconds explicitly. Draft window moved from five days to seven for creators on two or more deliverables.
Decision needed
Reallocate remaining budget toward nano tier for the final flight, or hold the mix for reach. Recommendation: shift roughly a third, keep two mid-tier creators for reach coverage.
Rebook / do not rebook
rebookrebookdo not rebook, no draft

Every section ends in an action. A report that ends in a chart gets read once and never acted on.

← Back to the case studyAsk me how this ranHappy to walk through the live versions in an interview.
Email meRésumé (PDF)LinkedIn